Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
524
32
4
1
Showing most recent decisions
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies despite landlord's claim of exemption in Tanritanir v Charmchi case.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies despite landlord's claim of exemption in Tanritanir v Charmchi case.
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies despite landlord's claim of exemption in Tanritanir v Charmchi case.
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies despite landlord's claim of exemption in Tanritanir v Charmchi case.
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies despite landlord's claim of exemption in Tanritanir v Charmchi case.
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies despite landlord's claim of exemption in Tanritanir v Charmchi case.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Landlord Win Rate: 25%
Landlord Win Rate: 16.67%
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument