Vladimir Nikitin
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
526
34
4
1
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 4 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Vladimir Nikitin's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 1 Orders since 2024PRO
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Harassment9
Landlord Win Rate: 22.22%
- Illegal Entry6
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Lockout6
Landlord Win Rate: 16.67%
- Persistent Late Payment6
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
- Maintenance Issues5
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
- Rent Increase4
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
Unlock Full Access to Vladimir Nikitin's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Kolagotla and Meruga v Grimes
Landlords withdraw eviction application against Greely tenants for breach of previous LTB order.
He v Zha
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
Campbell v Horwood
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
MacDougall v Lamanna
Uxbridge tenants awarded $2,848 after landlord found to harass, interfere with their rental unit.
Mokhtarihajiyar v Charmchi
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies, despite Landlord's claim of exemption for shared kitchen and bathroom.
Kolagotla and Meruga v Grimes
Landlords withdraw eviction application against Greely tenants for breach of previous LTB order.
He v Zha
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
Campbell v Horwood
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
MacDougall v Lamanna
Uxbridge tenants awarded $2,848 after landlord found to harass, interfere with their rental unit.
Mokhtarihajiyar v Charmchi
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies, despite Landlord's claim of exemption for shared kitchen and bathroom.
Kolagotla and Meruga v Grimes
Landlords withdraw eviction application against Greely tenants for breach of previous LTB order.
He v Zha
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
Campbell v Horwood
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
MacDougall v Lamanna
Uxbridge tenants awarded $2,848 after landlord found to harass, interfere with their rental unit.
Mokhtarihajiyar v Charmchi
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies, despite Landlord's claim of exemption for shared kitchen and bathroom.
Kolagotla and Meruga v Grimes
Landlords withdraw eviction application against Greely tenants for breach of previous LTB order.
He v Zha
LTB dismisses tenant's claims of illegal lockout and harassment, as tenant had vacated unit and rented to unauthorized occupants without landlord's consent.
Campbell v Horwood
Tenant awarded $18,783 and landlord fined $7,000 for illegal lockout, harassment, and interference with reasonable enjoyment in Cobourg rental dispute.
MacDougall v Lamanna
Uxbridge tenants awarded $2,848 after landlord found to harass, interfere with their rental unit.
Mokhtarihajiyar v Charmchi
North York landlord ordered to pay $6,792 and $10,000 fine for illegally locking out tenants.
LTB rules Residential Tenancies Act applies, despite Landlord's claim of exemption for shared kitchen and bathroom.
Unlock Full Access to Vladimir Nikitin's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument